95-ORD-081 is cited as an example to illustrate the procedural requirements under KRS 61.872(4) regarding the notification obligations when a public agency does not have custody of requested records. The decision discusses how the city initially failed but ultimately complied with these requirements, similar to the procedural context discussed in 95-ORD-081.
95-ORD-081 was Cited by 97-ORD-057
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.