Skip to main content
95-ORD-052 is discussed to differentiate the current case from the precedent where a requester was entitled not to be mailed copies of records prior to an on-site inspection. The decision explains that the context of 95-ORD-052 does not apply here because Mr. Jones was not charged for the copies, and his option to inspect the records on-site remained available.
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Source:
Target:
Treatment:
Cited
Authored By:
gpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.