The decision cites 94-ORD-085 as controlling precedent for the current case, specifically regarding the application of the preliminary documents exception under KRS 61.878(1)(j). It states that the issues raised in the current appeal were previously adjudicated in 94-ORD-85, and thus follows the reasoning and conclusions of that earlier decision.
94-ORD-085 was Followed by 96-ORD-166
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.