94-ORD-045 is cited by the appellant to argue that the public interest in disclosure of names and addresses outweighs the minimal privacy interest. However, the decision notes that this case is not controlling because it predates a more relevant Court of Appeals decision and was based on specific facts that do not establish a general rule for all cases.
94-ORD-045 was Cited by 96-ORD-123
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.