OAG 92-161 is cited in the decision to illustrate a precedent where payments to county attorneys for collecting child support did not violate constitutional salary limitations, similar to the current case under review. The decision references this opinion to support the argument that payments for services not part of official duties are permissible, aligning with the reasoning in Buchignani, which is central to the current case.
OAG 92-161 was Cited by OAG 95-031
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.