94-ORD-019 is cited by the appellant, Mr. Cullinan, to argue that KRS 61.878(1) is inapplicable to his request as neither he nor Roy Cullinan are parties to the litigation mentioned in the denial of the request. This citation is used to support his argument against the City's application of the exemption.
94-ORD-019 was Cited by 94-ORD-088
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.