The citation '94-OMD-087' appears to be a typographical error or misreference in the decision text, as the decision itself is identified as '94-OMD-87'. The decision discusses the appeal by Brent O. Hardin regarding the handling of his complaint about a meeting of the Board of Aldermen, which he claimed violated the Open Meetings Act because not everyone could attend due to space limitations. The decision concludes that the city did not violate the Open Meetings Act as they provided reasonable access by allowing overflow attendees to view the meeting in another room via television.
94-OMD-087 was N by 94-ORD-087
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.