This citation is used to support the decision by demonstrating a precedent where similar issues were addressed regarding the nondisclosure of preliminary documents under KRS 61.878(1)(h) and (i). The decision follows the reasoning and conclusions of 92-ORD-136 in determining that the Department did not meet its burden of proof to justify the nondisclosure.
92-ORD-136 was Followed by 93-ORD-120
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.