OAG 92-56 is cited in the decision as a precedent that directly addresses and resolves the issue in the current case. The decision follows the reasoning and conclusion of OAG 92-56, which held that an inmate must identify specific documents for inspection rather than requesting non-confidential portions of his inmate file in general.
OAG 92-56 was Followed by 92-ORD-131
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.