OAG 77-45 is cited in the decision to address the interpretation of the term 'guardian' as used in KRS 194.060(1)(a). The decision discusses the previous interpretation provided in OAG 77-45, which considered de facto guardians under certain conditions as guardians for the purpose of record confidentiality. However, the decision distinguishes the current case from OAG 77-45, stating that the term 'guardian' does not include former guardians, which is relevant to the case at hand where the Kesslings were former de facto guardians of Angela Phipps.
OAG 77-45 was Cited by OAG 91-30
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.