OAG 88-32 is cited to clarify that not every taped record of an agency proceeding at which an attorney is present is exempt under KRS 61.878(1)(j) as attorney work product or protected by the attorney/client privilege. The decision distinguishes the current case from OAG 88-32, where the tape was used solely to assist in preparing minutes and was deemed exempt.
OAG 88-32 was Cited by OAG 91-109
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.