This citation is used to support the argument that the privacy exception of KRS 61.878(1)(a) is not applicable in the situation discussed, reinforcing the principle that the privacy of complainants can be protected without exempting the entire document from disclosure.
OAG 88-25 was Followed by OAG 90-58
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.