OAG 78-616 is cited in the decision to clarify and modify a previous interpretation regarding the counting of abstentions in voting scenarios. The decision explicitly states that the interpretation provided in OAG 78-616, which required a majority of the quorum to vote on a proposition before considering the vote of abstaining members, is not supported by applicable case law. Therefore, the decision modifies the earlier opinion to align with the correct legal interpretation.
OAG 78-616 was Modified by OAG 87-38
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.