OAG 78-150 is cited in the decision to discuss the historical context and legal interpretation of the parole function as vested in the district judge of the sentencing court prior to legislative changes. The decision uses OAG 78-150 to illustrate the evolution of the law regarding who may grant parole, and to support the argument that the current statute allowing judges to grant parole is unconstitutional.
OAG 78-150 was Cited by OAG 82-618
Our AG treatments are described and categorized by large language models (AI) and are partially reviewed by Coalition directors. Learn more from our blog.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.