These open records decisions were issued by the Kentucky Attorney General last week:
21-ORD-080 (In re: Jimmy Cantrell/The Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources)
Summary: The Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (the "Department") violated the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it did not issue a timely written response to deny a request for records. However, the Department did not subvert the intent of the Act by delaying inspection of voluminous and widely dispersed records for two months.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2021/21-ORD-0…
21-ORD-081 (In re: Emily Lacey/Kentucky State Police)
Summary: Kentucky State Police ("KSP") did not violate the Open Records Act ("the Act") when it denied copies of JC-3 forms under KRS 620.050(5) or when it did not provide records that do not exist in its possession.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2021/21-ORD-0…
21-ORD-082 (In re: Beth McMasters/Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure)
Summary: The Kentucky Board Medical Licensure ("Board") did not violate the Open Records Act.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2021/21-ORD-0…
21-ORD-083 (In re: Leonel Martinez/Office of the Governor)
Summary: The Office of the Governor (the "Governor's Office") did not violate the Open Records Act (the "Act") when its timely response to a request to inspect records was mailed to an incorrect address. The Governor's Office also did not violate the Act when it did not produce records that did not exist in its possession.
https://ag.ky.gov/Priorities/Government-Transparency/orom/2021/21-ORD-0…
