Skip to main content
Cited Statutes Annotation
Chandler v. Bullitt County 61.810, 61.815 Where a planning commission explained it was going into closed session, the minutes reflected the discussion concerning litigation, motions to authorize the litigation were made in open meetings, and there was no record of anyone requesting to address the commission or voice concern about the commission’s actions, there was no evidence that the owners were prejudiced by a planning commission’s failure to state a specific provision of KRS 61.810(1)(c), 61.815(1) when it went into closed session. Chandler v. Bullitt County Joint Planning Comm'n, 125 S.W.3d 851, 2002 Ky. App. LEXIS 2358 (Ky. Ct. App. 2002). Link
Stinson v. State Bd. of Accountancy 61.815 By conducting its final deliberations in a closed session without substantial compliance with this section, the State Board of Accountancy rendered its action in censuring an accountant voidable under KRS 61.830 (now repealed); however, since the accountant raised no objection and demonstrated no prejudice as a result of the Board’s action, the action was not void. Stinson v. State Bd. of Accountancy, 625 S.W.2d 589, 1981 Ky. App. LEXIS 304 (Ky. Ct. App. 1981). Link
Webster Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Franklin 61.805, 61.810, 61.800, 61.815 Litigation exception to open public meetings was not applicable to the school board’s decision directing legal counsel to pursue a challenge to the petition to recall the board’s nickel tax because it was a “final action” of the board to authorize litigation. Webster County Bd. of Educ. v. Newell, 392 S.W.3d 431, 2013 Ky. App. LEXIS 31 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). Link
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.