Constitutionality

Cited	Statutes	Annotation
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 61.870	61.870	Former Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 61.870(1(h) was not unconstitutional for being vague because the statute was not void-as-unintelligible, as (1) the people the statute affected could understand the statute, and (2) courts could deduce the legislature's will, as undefined terms found to render the statute unintelligible were commonly defined. Util. Mgmt. Grp., LLC v. Pike Cty. Fiscal Court, 531 S.W.3d 3, 2017 Ky. LEXIS 441 (Ky. 2017). Link
Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 61.870	61.870	Pre-amendment version of Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 61.870(1)(h) was constitutional as it was sufficiently definite that a common man of ordinary intelligence could read and subscribe meaning to it. Pike Cnty. Fiscal Court v. Util. Mgmt. Grp., LLC, 2015 Ky. App. LEXIS 88 (Ky. Ct. App. June 12, 2015, sub. op., 2015 Ky. App. Unpub. LEXIS 880 (Ky. Ct. App. June 12, 2015). Link
Amelkin v. McClure	61.874	Because attorneys’ and chiropractors’ constitutional challenge to KRS 189.635 failed, thus generally keeping state police accident reports confidential from them, their simultaneous constitutional challenge to KRS 61.874 over the amount they were being charged for copies of those reports was moot since they were no longer entitled to receive them at all. Amelkin v. McClure, 330 F.3d 822, 2003 FED App. 0168P, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 10832 (6th Cir. Ky.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1050, 124 S. Ct. 827, 157 L. Ed. 2d 699, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 8627 (U.S. 2003). Link

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.