Skip to main content
Cited Statutes Annotation
Carter v. Smith 61.810, 61.848 Because a closed session in a meeting of a county board of education was not justified by any of the statutory exceptions in KRS 61.810, substantial compliance could not be found under KRS 61.848. There cannot be substantial compliance when an agency entirely fails to comply with the law by entering a closed session to which none of the exceptions apply. Carter v. Smith, 366 S.W.3d 414, 2012 Ky. LEXIS 66 (Ky. 2012). Link
Webster Cnty. Bd. of Educ. v. Franklin 61.810, 61.815, 61.848 Trial court properly exercised it authority to void the action of the school board directing legal counsel to pursue litigation because the board did not substantially comply with the Open Meetings Act. Webster County Bd. of Educ. v. Newell, 392 S.W.3d 431, 2013 Ky. App. LEXIS 31 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013). Link
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.