Annotation for 416 S.W.3d 313

Where a university appealed a circuit’s denial of its motion for summary judgment, the university had not violated the Open Records Act; the circuit court and the Officer of the Attorney General incorrectly determined that the four e-mails at issue lost the preliminary status afforded to them by KRS 61.878(1)(i) and (j) because the e-mails were incorporated into a final agency action, a meeting, and thus had to be disclosed. There had been no final agency action. Univ. of Louisville v. Sharp, 416 S.W.3d 313, 2013 Ky. App. LEXIS 161 (Ky. Ct. App. 2013).