Skip to main content

24-ORD-212

September 27 2024

In re: Sarah Thomas/University of Kentucky

Summary: The University of Kentucky (the “University”) violated the
Open Records Act (“the Act”) when it failed to grant or deny a request
made under the Act within five business days or properly invoke
KRS 61.872(5) to delay the production of public records beyond five
business days.

Open Records Decision

On August 16, 2024, Sarah Thomas (“Appellant”) submitted a request to the
University for records containing three subparts.1 On August 20, 2024, the University
confirmed receipt of the request and stated that it “will need beyond the statutory
five business days to respond” and that it “will provide [her] an update on [her]
request within five business days.” On August 28, 2024, having received no further
response from the University, the Appellant initiated this appeal.

Under KRS 61.880(1), upon receiving a request for records under the Act, a
public agency “shall determine within five (5) [business] days . . . after the receipt of
any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the
person making the request, within the five (5) day period, of its decision.” A public
agency may also delay access to responsive records if such records are “in active use,

1
Subpart one sought “[a]ll email correspondence sent or received by Craig van Horne, MD, from
March 25, 2024 to May 17, 2024 containing the phrases ‘Sarah’; ‘Thomas’; ‘CCC’; ‘competency’; ‘review’;
‘letter’; ‘decision’; ‘performance’; ‘professionalism’; ‘communication’; ‘complaint’; and/or ‘appeal’.”
Subpart two sought “University of Kentucky Graduate Medical Education Committee (GMEC)
meeting minutes from December 1, 2023 to present.” Subpart three sought a “copy of the file ‘2024
Neurosurgery Special Review Action Items 6-2024 Update.xlsx’ including any revised or updated
versions of that file.”storage, or not otherwise available.” KRS 61.872(5). A public agency that invokes
KRS 61.872(5) to delay access to responsive records must also notify the requester of
the earliest date on which the records will be available and provide a detailed
explanation for the cause of the delay.

Here, the Appellant submitted a request to the University on August 16, and
the University confirmed receipt of it on August 20, 2024. The University issued a
response within five business days, but that response did not grant or deny the
Appellant’s request. Instead, the University stated it “will need beyond the statutory
five business days to respond” and that it “will provide [her] an update on [her]
request within five business days.” Thus, although the University’s response to the
Appellant’s request was timely, it was otherwise deficient. The University’s response
did not explicitly invoke KRS 61.872(5), indicate that the records are “in active use,
storage, or not otherwise available[,]” notify the Appellant of the earliest date the
records would be available, or provide a detailed explanation for the cause of delay.
Accordingly, the University violated the Act when it failed to appropriately respond
to a request.2

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the
appropriate circuit court under KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882 within 30 days from
the date of this decision. Under KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified
of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in
any subsequent proceedings. The Attorney General will accept notice of the complaint
emailed to OAGAppeals@ky.gov.

Russell Coleman

Attorney General

/s/ Matthew Ray

Matthew Ray

Assistant Attorney General

2
The University states that, on August 29, 2024, it “informed [the Appellant] that it was in the
process of gathering, processing, and redacting records that are responsive to her request and that she
could expect a response by October 15, 2024.” As proof, the University provides a copy of an email
dated August 29 informing the Appellant that “[w]hile [it] cannot say for certain when [it] will be able
to respond, [its] hope is that it is before October 15.”#369

Distributed to:

Sarah Thomas
Amy R. Spagnuolo
William Thro

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Sarah Thomas
Agency:
University of Kentucky
Type:
Open Records Decision
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.