Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;James M. Herrick,Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

The question presented in this appeal is whether the Louisville Metro Department of Corrections ("LMDC") violated the Open Records Act in the disposition of Derrick Hargrove's December 8, 2017, request for "[a] copy of the letter RE: Verification Of Incarceration from Derrick Hargrove # 142117, December 5, 2017 AND: the response thereto." For the reasons that follow, we find no violation of the Act.

Mr. Hargrove, currently an inmate at Little Sandy Correctional Complex, attaches to his appeal a copy of his December 8 request, to which he states he received no response. In a response to this appeal dated December 28, 2017, Assistant Jefferson County Attorney Annale E. Renneker states that "LMDC has no record of receiving Mr. Hargrove's open records request dated December 5, 2017 or December 8, 2017" in its open records log. While LMDC did send Mr. Hargrove a completed Verification of Incarceration form after receiving this appeal, 1 it appears that LMDC had not previously received his prior correspondence, and, consequently, that no records existed which would have been responsive to that request.

A public agency cannot afford a requester access to a record that it does not have or that does not exist. 99-ORD-98. The agency discharges its duty under the Open Records Act by affirmatively so stating. 99-ORD-150. Accordingly, we find no violation of the Act in this instance.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General shall be notified of any action in circuit court, but shall not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings.

Footnotes

Footnotes

LLM Summary
The decision addresses an appeal regarding an open records request made by Derrick Hargrove to the Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, which was allegedly not responded to. The agency claimed it had no record of receiving the request. The decision concludes that there was no violation of the Open Records Act, citing precedents that an agency cannot provide records it does not have and fulfills its duty by stating so.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Derrick Hargrove
Agency:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2018 Ky. AG LEXIS 9
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.