Opinion
Opinion By: Andy Beshear,Attorney General;Amye L. Bensenhaver,Assistant Attorney General
Open Meetings Decision
Chris Hawkins appeals Green River Correctional Complex's response to his November 2, 2015, request for "1) document where nurse Rita Stevens documented a cut on my finger on 10/24/15 when I entered SMU; 2) documentation regarding my having a seizure in SMU @ GRCC and where the seizure resulted in my biting on a mattress; 3) test confirmations reflecting me having HCV and also Hypothyroid." In a timely written response, GRCC advised Mr. Hawkins that the following disposition was made of his request: "10-24-15, cut on finger does not exist. 9 pages given to [inmate] ." On appeal, Mr. Hawkins concedes that he "signed [his] name acknowledging receipt of 9 pages . . . but [he] didn't state that the 9 pages included everything that [he] requested." He notes that part of the "nurse's statement" that was released to him, and that related to the mattress biting incident, had been "torn off." Further, he expresses the suspicion that "there is more relating [sic] documents/documentation. "
Responding to Mr. Hawkins' appeal, Justice and Public Safety Cabinet Assistant General Counsel submitted supplemental arguments in support of the facility's position. Counsel explained that on November 20, Green River Correctional Complex Administrative Specialist Ann George notified Mr. Hawkins, in writing, that further review of his medical records revealed the existence of lab test results that might be "what [he was] seeking specific to 'test confirmations. '" Ms. George stated that the lab test results would be released to him upon receipt of a "money authorization (cpo) and medical records request form to GRCC medical records department." 1 Continuing, counsel observed:
A further review was made by GRCC Offender Information Staff after the appeal was received. Offender Information Staff again determined that the only other possibly responsive documents had already been provided to Inmate Hawkins in another open records request response and by security staff at the initiation of a disciplinary action and that no additional records existed. If Inmate Hawkins seeks additional copies of the part I of his disciplinary report and the day cell log previously provided, then he needs to explain why it is necessary for additional copies to be provided to him.
On behalf of GRCC, counsel asserted that the facility was not obligated to provide Mr. Hawkins with copies of records previously released to him and could not provide him with records that do not exist.
Responding to GRCC's supplemental defense, Mr. Hawkins objected to the belated identification of responsive records, arguing that the facility's records officer "should've provided [the lab test results and the entire nurses entry] rather than to merely offer to sell the records to [him] after [he had] to appeal her open records act violation." Additionally, he indicated that he "didn't request or even insinuate wanting another copy of a disciplinary report."
We find that GRCC's original response to Mr. Hawkins' November 2 open records request was deficient insofar as it failed to address each part of his three part request. Neither Mr. Hawkins nor GRCC describe the nine records originally released to him, but those records did not include an unredacted copy of Nurse Stevens' October 27, 2015, progress notes or a copy of the lab test results. The lab test results were located on or about November 20, 2015, eighteen days after his original request and eleven days after he initiated his appeal. 2 On November 20, GRCC agreed to provide him with copies of the lab test results upon prepayment of reproduction charges. The copy of the progress note that Mr. Hawkins obtained at an unspecified point in time and that he attached to his appeal contains a large space in which no text appears and the bottom inch to inch and one-half has been manually removed making the page raw-edged and visibly shorter than a standard 8 1/2" by 11" sheet of paper. GRCC's original response, if it included this note, provided no explanation for the ostensibly omitted information.
In Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Chestnut, 250 S.W.3d 655, 662 (Ky. 2008), the Kentucky Supreme Court expressed its agreement with "the District Court of Rhode Island's astute holding" that an open records request:
should not require the specificity and cunning of a carefully drawn set of discovery requests, so as to outwit narrowing legalistic interpretations by the government. A citizen should be able to submit a brief and simple request for the government to make full disclosure or openly assert its reasons for nondisclosure.
Chestnut, 250 S.W.3d at 662 quoting Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 460 F.Supp. 778, 792 (D.R.I. 1978) reversed on other grounds on appeal 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir. 1979). Mr. Hawkins submitted "a brief and simple request for the government to make full disclosure or openly assert its reasons for nondisclosure. " Id. 3 GRCC's original response reflects an inadequate search for responsive records and a failure to "openly assert its reasons for nondisclosure" vis -`-vis Nurse Steven's redacted progress note. Mr. Hawkins is entitled to a written explanation for those redactions with citation to applicable legal authority.
He is not, however, entitled to a copy of the lab test results before he provides the required prepayment. Mr. Hawkins was surely afforded an opportunity to scan the nine records released to him on or about November 9 and should not have "signed off" on receipt of those records if the records he reviewed, and for which he prepaid, were not responsive to his request. He cannot now substitute prepayment for nonresponsive records with prepayment for responsive records. Although GRCC's original search for responsive records may have been inadequate, its belated identification of responsive lab test results did not diminish its statutory right to require prepayment for copies. KRS 61.872(3)(b); KRS 61.874(1). Mr. Hawkins may obtain copies of the lab test results after he complies with the prepayment requirement.
Neither Mr. Hawkins' original request, nor this appeal, implicate disciplinary records, and any suggestion to the contrary only muddies the waters. We urge these parties to take appropriate measures, as set forth above, to fully and finally resolve the issues on appeal.
Either party may appeal this decision by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.
Footnotes
Footnotes
1 Counsel does not indicate on what date Nurse Stevens' progress note was released to him. In her November 20 memorandum to Mr. Hawkins, Ms. George states that she "provided [Mr. Hawkins] with the nurse's entry of [the mattress biting incident]" and that "no further record of any seizure like activity exists on this other" than that with which was provided on a separate unspecified date. The "nurse's entry" might have been included in the "9 pages given to him" on November 9, 2015.
2 Mr. Hawkins initiated this appeal on November 9.
3 This office has stated that an agency conducts an adequate search when, in good faith, it "use[s] methods which can reasonably be expected to produce the records requested." 04-ORD-242, p. 4, citing 95-ORD-96, p. 7. A request for tests confirming an illness clearly encompasses lab test results that were overlooked in the original search.
2015
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 234
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 235
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 236
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 232
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 231
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 233
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 230
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 227
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 229
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 228
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 226
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 225
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 224
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 223
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 222
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 221
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 217
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 216
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 215
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 218
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 219
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 220
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 214
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 212
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 213
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 211
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 210
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 209
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 208
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 207
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 206
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 204
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 205
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 203
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 201
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 202
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 200
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 199
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 198
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 197
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 196
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 195
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 190
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 193
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 189
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 191
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 192
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 194
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 187
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 188
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 186
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 185
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 184
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 183
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 182
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 181
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 180
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 179
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 178
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 176
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 177
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 175
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 174
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 172
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 173
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 171
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 167
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 169
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 170
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 168
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 166
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 163
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 165
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 164
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 161
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 159
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 162
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 157
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 158
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 160
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 153
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 154
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 156
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 155
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 152
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 147
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 149
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 146
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 151
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 148
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 150
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 143
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 145
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 144
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 142
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 141
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 140
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 134
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 139
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 135
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 138
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 131
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 136
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 137
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 132
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 133
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 130
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 129
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 127
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 128
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 125
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 126
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 124
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 123
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 122
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 121
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 120
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 119
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 118
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 115
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 117
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 116
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 113
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 112
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 114
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 111
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 110
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 109
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 107
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 106
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 104
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 105
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 108
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 99
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 102
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 100
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 101
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 98
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 96
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 97
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 95
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 94
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 92
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 93
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 90
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 89
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 91
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 87
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 84
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 83
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 86
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 85
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 88
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 80
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 82
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 81
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 79
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 78
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 77
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 76
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 66
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 74
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 75
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 73
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 103
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 72
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 70
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 69
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 71
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 68
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 65
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 67
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 61
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 62
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 63
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 64
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 60
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 58
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 59
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 55
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 56
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 54
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 57
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 53
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 52
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 44
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 51
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 48
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 47
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 46
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 45
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 49
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 50
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 42
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 43
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 41
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 40
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 39
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 33
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 37
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 38
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 34
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 36
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 35
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 18
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 19
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 17
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 28
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 30
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 31
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 29
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 27
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 32
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 25
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 26
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 24
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 20
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 21
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 22
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 23
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 12
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 16
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 15
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 13
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 14
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 11
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 1
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 10
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 8
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 9
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 7
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 6
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 2
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 4
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 3
2015 Ky. AG LEXIS 5