Opinion
Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Matt James, Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Decision
The question presented in this appeal is whether the Kentucky State Reformatory ("KSR") violated the Open Records Act in withholding recreation budget and band program records that did not contain a specific reference to the inmate. We find that KSR did not violate the Open Records Act in withholding recreation budget and band program records that did not contain a specific reference to the inmate.
Cameron Davenport ("Davenport") submitted an open records request to KSR on June 18, 2014, received June 24, 2014. Davenport requested "documents portraying the overall budget for the recreation department for the past (5) five years, amount that was alloted for the Band program for past (5) five years, also copy of documents showing all Band Equiptment purschased for past five (5) years from 2009 to 2013." KSR denied the request on June 24, 2014 on the grounds that "since the public record(s) you requested do not contain a specific reference to you, the records are exempt from disclosure to you under KRS 61.878(1)(l) and KRS 197.025(2)." Davenport initiated this appeal on June 24, 2014. KSR responded to Cameron's appeal on July 15, 2014, stating that Davenport "was not entitled to a copy of the requested records since the requested records involving the recreation budget and band program are not the type of record to contain a specific reference to an inmate. "
KRS 197.025(2) provides that "the department shall not be required to comply with a request for any record from any inmate . . . unless the request is for a record which contains a specific reference to that individual." "We have consistently interpreted this provision as supporting the Department of Corrections' position that only documents mentioning the inmate by name need be provided." 14-ORD-088; 09-ORD-057. Accordingly, since the requested records concerning the recreation budget band program do not contain a reference to Davenport, KSR did not violate the Open Records Act in failing to provide them.
A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5)(a). The Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or any subsequent proceedings.
Distributed to:
Cameron Davenport # 107006Samantha RashAmy V. Barker