Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Garrard Circuit Court Clerk is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act, and therefore did not violate the Act in its disposition of Owen Gadd's request for a copy of the audiotape of his August 15, 16, 2005, trial. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Distributed to:

Owen Gadd, # 190417Dana Hensley

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision concludes that the Garrard Circuit Court Clerk is not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act regarding a request for an audiotape of a trial, based on the precedent set in 98-ORD-006. The decision affirms that the clerk did not violate the Act in handling the request.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Owen Gadd
Agency:
Garrard Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2013 Ky. AG LEXIS 183
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.