Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Pulaski Circuit Court Clerk is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act, and therefore did not violate the Act in the disposition of Carlos Cochran's request for "procedures, documents, etc." relating to his incarceration and upcoming trial. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling. The Pulaski Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Open Records Act in the disposition of Mr. Cochran's request, and this agency, in its role as an open records mediator under KRS 61.880(2), is not charged with investigating allegations of improprieties in Grand Jury proceedings.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Carlos CochranGeorge Flynn

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Carlos Cochran
Agency:
Pulaski Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2010 Ky. AG LEXIS 50
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.