Skip to main content

Request By:
Adam Anthony Barker, # 199465
R. David Stengel
Harry J. Rothgerber

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the 30th Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act in denying Adam Anthony Barker's request for the transcripts of the grand jury proceedings relating to case numbers 04CR3560, 05CR0239, and 05CR1958 pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(h). We believe that 00-ORD-116, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Adam Anthony Barker
Agency:
Office of the Commonwealth Attorney for the 30th Judicial District
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2009 Ky. AG LEXIS 38
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.