Skip to main content

Request By:
Roger Gibson, # 162564
Mike Lawrence

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

At issue in this appeal is whether the McCracken Circuit Court Clerk violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in failing to respond upon receipt of Roger Gibson's written request for a copy of the "Indictment, Judgment of Conviction, Docket Sheet, Guilty Plea, Police Reports and Uniform Offense Report" concerning Indictment No. 02-CR-121. Because records in the custody of circuit court clerks are properly characterized as court records, which are not governed by the Open Records Act, rather than public records within the meaning of KRS 61.870(2), the Attorney General has consistently recognized that circuit court clerks are not subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act. Consequently, the McCracken Circuit Court Clerk cannot be said to have violated the Act in failing to respond upon receipt of Mr. Gibson's request as would otherwise be required by KRS 61.880(1). In our view, 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling on the facts presented.

That being said, Circuit Court Clerk Mike Lawrence responded to Mr. Gibson's appeal upon receiving notification from this office. According to Mr. Lawrence, his office does not have any record of ever having received Mr. Gibson's April 11, 2008, request; 1 however, Mr. Lawrence nevertheless enclosed a copy of the requested Indictment, Final Judgment, Guilty Plea, Judgment on Guilty Plea, Citation and Case History, advising that his file does not contain any police reports except for the citation but if any such reports exist, "they must be obtained from the Commonwealth['s] Attorney or from the attorney that represented" him. In so doing, the Clerk, to his credit, exceeded his obligations under the Open Records Act; any issues related to records provided to Mr. Gibson would also be moot per 40 KAR 1:030, Section 6 if this appeal was not resolved on the basis of 98-ORD-6.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Footnotes

Footnotes

1 Such factual disputes concerning the actual delivery and receipt of a request cannot be resolved in the context of an Open Records appeal.

LLM Summary
The decision addresses an appeal concerning whether the McCracken Circuit Court Clerk violated the Kentucky Open Records Act by not responding to a written request for specific court documents. It concludes that the Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Act because the documents requested are court records, not public records governed by the Act. This determination is based on the precedent set by 98-ORD-006, which is followed in this decision. Additionally, the decision notes that the Circuit Court Clerk, upon learning of the appeal, provided the requested documents, thus exceeding his obligations under the Act.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Roger Gibson
Agency:
McCracken Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2008 Ky. AG LEXIS 113
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.