Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk is not bound by the provisions of the Kentucky Open Records Act and therefore did not violate the Act in its disposition of Daryl G. Shultz's request for a copy of records relating to the Commonwealth of Kentucky's criminal action in Case Number 02J504013-004. We believe that 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision finds that the Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk is not subject to the Kentucky Open Records Act, based on the precedent set in 98-ORD-006, and therefore did not violate the Act in handling a request for records related to a criminal action.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Daryl G. Shultz
Agency:
Jefferson Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2008 Ky. AG LEXIS 200
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.