Skip to main content

Request By:
Robert F. Jones, # 031469
Paul F. Williams

Opinion

Opinion By: Jack Conway, Attorney General; Michelle D. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

At issue in this appeal is whether the Harlan Circuit Court Clerk violated the Kentucky Open Records Act in failing to respond upon receipt of Robert F. Jones' request for any and all records pertaining to Case Nos. 04-CR-00342, 04-CR-00343, 04-CR-00344, and 05-CR-00090. Because records in the custody of circuit court clerks are properly characterized as court records, which are not governed by the Open Records Act, rather than public records within the meaning of KRS 61.870(2), the Attorney General has consistently recognized that circuit court clerks are not subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act. Consequently, the Harlan Circuit Court Clerk cannot be said to have violated the Act in failing to respond upon receipt of Mr. Jones' request as otherwise be required by KRS 61.880(1). In our view, 98-ORD-6, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling on the facts presented.

That being said, Chief Deputy Barbara Arvin responded on behalf of the Circuit Court Clerk upon receiving notification of Mr. Jones' appeal from this office. According to the deputy clerks, the records being sought were previously forwarded to Mr. Jones; however, Ms. Arvin could find "no documentation of that in the record" and, to her credit, instructed them to "prepare the information again and send by certified mail to [Mr. Jones] ASAP." In so doing, the Chief Deputy, acting on behalf of the Circuit Court Clerk, exceeded her statutory obligations.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision addresses an appeal concerning whether the Harlan Circuit Court Clerk violated the Kentucky Open Records Act by not responding to a request for records. It concludes that the Circuit Court Clerk did not violate the Act because the records requested are court records, not public records under the Open Records Act. The decision follows precedent set by 98-ORD-006, which established that circuit court clerks are not subject to the provisions of the Open Records Act. Additionally, it notes that the Chief Deputy exceeded statutory obligations by instructing staff to resend the requested records to Mr. Jones.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Robert F. Jones
Agency:
Harlan Circuit Court Clerk
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2008 Ky. AG LEXIS 63
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.