Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Gregory D. Stumbo, Office of Attorney General; James M. Ringo, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

The question presented in this appeal is whether the action of the Office of the Governor relative to the open records request of Michael D. Combs for "a copy of all documentation relating to the law firm of Greenebaum, Doll & McDonald's use of the Governor's mansion," violated the Open Records Act. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the agency's disposition of Mr. Combs' request.

By letter dated May 25, 2005, Michael T. Alexander, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the Governor, responded to Mr. Combs' request, advising:

There are no records in the Office of the Governor responsive to your request. However, please contact Robert Rudolph, Secretary of the Finance and Administration Cabinet, the official custodian of the records you seek.

On July 11, 2005, Mr. Combs initiated the instant appeal.

We begin by noting that a public agency cannot afford a requester access to a record that it does not have or that does not exist. 99-ORD-98. The agency discharges its duty under the Open Records Act by affirmatively so stating. 99-ORD-150. The Office of the Governor discharged its duty under the Open Records Act by advising Mr. Combs that that office is not the custodian of the requested records. 99-ORD-150. Accordingly, we find no violation of the Open Records Act in this regard.

KRS 61.872(4) provides:

If the person to whom the application is directed does not have custody or control of the public record requested, that person shall notify the applicant and shall furnish the name and location of the official custodian of the agency's public records.

As noted above, the Office of the Governor affirmatively advised Mr. Combs that it did not have records responsive to his request. The only additional duty of the public agency in such a situation is to advise the requesting party of the name and location of the official custodian of the agency that would have the records in question, if such information is known to the agency. KRS 61.872(4); 03-ORD-225. This is what the Office of the Governor did. The Open Records Act requires no more.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating an action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Michael D. Combs5 Fernwood CourtAlexandria, KY 41001

Michael T. AlexanderDeputy General CounselOffice of the Governor700 Capitol AvenueSuite 100Frankfort, KY 40601

LLM Summary
The decision affirms the action of the Office of the Governor in responding to an open records request by Michael D. Combs, stating that the office did not violate the Open Records Act. The Office of the Governor correctly informed Mr. Combs that it did not possess the requested records and directed him to the appropriate custodian of the records. The decision follows previous Open Records Decisions and Kentucky Revised Statutes in determining that the Office of the Governor fulfilled its obligations under the law.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Michael D. Combs
Agency:
Office of the Governor
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2005 Ky. AG LEXIS 241
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.