Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the Twentieth Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act in the disposition of Joseph Charlie Hill's December 17, 2002 request for copies of the "Evidence Video[s]" identified in that request. We believe that 00-ORD-116, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is dispositive of the issue Mr. Hill raises. Although that decision deals specifically with grand jury transcripts in the custody of Commonwealth's Attorneys, it is clear that KRS 61.878(1)(h) extends to any "record[] or information compiled and maintained by . . . Commonwealth's Attorneys pertaining to criminal investigations or criminal litigation," affording the record or information permanent exemption from inspection under the Open Records Act even "after enforcement action, including litigation, is completed or a decision is made to take no action." Simply stated, the Commonwealth's Attorney has no legal obligation under the Open Records Act to furnish Mr. Hill with a copy of the tape and his decision to do so or not to do so rests entirely in his discretion. Further, we find that an open records appeal is not the appropriate forum in which to attempt to compel compliance with a court order directed to the Greenup Circuit Court Clerk, especially when that appeal is brought against the Commonwealth's Attorney.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

Joseph Charlie HillP.O. Box 81Argillite, KY 41121

Clifford R. DuvallCommonwealth's Attorney201 Harrison StreetP.O. Box 378Greenup, KY 41144

LLM Summary
The decision concludes that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the Twentieth Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act by not providing Joseph Charlie Hill with copies of the 'Evidence Video[s]' he requested. The decision references 00-ORD-116 to support the finding that records related to criminal investigations or litigation held by Commonwealth's Attorneys are permanently exempt from inspection under the Open Records Act. It also notes that an open records appeal is not the correct forum to compel compliance with a court order directed to another party, in this case, the Greenup Circuit Court Clerk.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Joseph Charlie Hill
Agency:
Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney--Twentieth Judicial District
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2003 Ky. AG LEXIS 186
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.