Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the Ninth Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act in the disposition of James England's request for the grand jury tape in Case Number 93-CR-172. Pursuant to KRS 61.878(1)(h), "records or information compiled and maintained by county attorneys or Commonwealth's attorneys pertaining to criminal investigations or criminal litigation shall be exempted from the provisions of KRS 61.870 to 61.884 and shall remain exempted after enforcement action, including litigation, is completed or a decision is made to take no action." We believe that 00-ORD-116, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings.

James England, # 127405Kentucky State Reformatory3001 W. Hwy. 146LaGrange, KY 40032

Chris ShawCommonwealth's Attorney54 Public SquareP.O. Box 127Elizabethtown, KY 42702

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision finds that the Commonwealth's Attorney for the Ninth Judicial District did not violate the Open Records Act by denying a request for a grand jury tape, citing KRS 61.878(1)(h) which exempts records related to criminal investigations or litigation from disclosure. The decision follows the precedent set in 00-ORD-116, which is attached and incorporated by reference, supporting the exemption of such records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
James England
Agency:
Office of the Commonwealth’s Attorney, Ninth Judicial District
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2002 Ky. AG LEXIS 199
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.