Skip to main content

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This question having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that PNC Bank is not a public agency for purposes of the Open Records Act, and therefore cannot be said to have violated the Act in the disposition of Anthony Mattingly's April 4, 2001, request for records relating to the unauthorized use of Mr. Mattingly's stolen credit card. We believe that OAG 79-325 and 92-ORD-1388, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference, are controlling. Records of PNC Bank are not public records, and are not subject to statutory regulation under the Open Records Act.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceedings.

Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Anthony Mattingly
Agency:
PNC Bank
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2001 Ky. AG LEXIS 74
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.