Skip to main content

Request By:
[NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL]

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the McCracken Commonwealth's Attorney did not violate the Open Record Act in denying Donald R. Stonum's May 10, 2000, request for the grand jury tapes in Indictment No. 93-CR-00182 on the basis of KRS 61.878(1)(h). We believe that 00-ORD-116, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision finds that the McCracken Commonwealth's Attorney did not violate the Open Records Act by denying a request for grand jury tapes, citing 00-ORD-116 as controlling precedent that supports the denial based on KRS 61.878(1)(h). The decision affirms the application of the law as interpreted in the cited order.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Donald R. Stonum
Agency:
McCracken Commonwealth’s Attorney
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2000 Ky. AG LEXIS 132
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.