Skip to main content

Request By:
[NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL]

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Oldham County Planning and Zoning Commission violated the Open Records Act by failing to respond to Ms. Ponder's December 9, 1999, request for records relating to certain properties identified in that request. We believe that 00-ORD-1, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, is controlling. In addition to the findings and conclusions in that decision, we note that KRS 61.880(1) does, in fact, mandate that:

Each public agency, upon any request for records made under KRS 61.870 to 61.884, shall determine within three (3) days , excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after the receipt of any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the request, within the three (3) day period, of its decision .

(Emphasis added.) Having exercised its KRS 61.872(2) right to require open records requesters like Ms. Ponder, to submit their requests in writing, it cannot evade its corollary KRS 61.880(1) duty to respond in writing, and within three business days. Contrary to the Commission's view, this is true notwithstanding the fact that it has decided to honor her request by permitting her to conduct an on-site inspection of the records during regular office hours. Because Ms. Ponder resides in the same county where the records are located, KRS 61.872(3)(b) authorizes the Commission to require her to inspect the records prior to furnishing her with copies.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The decision finds that the Oldham County Planning and Zoning Commission violated the Open Records Act by failing to respond to a records request within the mandated three-day period. The decision follows the precedent set in 00-ORD-001, which is explicitly cited as controlling and is incorporated by reference into the current decision. The decision emphasizes the statutory requirements for public agencies to respond to records requests in writing within three business days, regardless of whether the request is to be fulfilled by allowing on-site inspection of the records.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Judy L. Ponder
Agency:
Oldham County Planning and Zoning Commission
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2000 Ky. AG LEXIS 70
Cites:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.