Skip to main content

Request By:
[NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL]

Opinion

Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General

Open Records Decision

This matter having been presented to the Attorney General in an open records appeal, and the Attorney General being sufficiently advised, we find that the Department of Corrections properly relied on KRS 197.025(2), incorporated into the Open Records Act by operation of KRS 61.878(1)(l), in denying Eric K. Murrell's November 15, 1999, request for "C.P.P. 15.3 as it read in 1987, 1989, 1991." We believe that 98-ORD-150, as it relates to the 1998 amendments to KRS 197.025, is controlling. A copy of that decision is attached hereto and incorporated by reference. Although Mr. Murrell vigorously argues that Corrections' policies and procedures relate directly to him, we find that this argument is tenuous at best. As he subsequently notes, such policies and procedures are "applicable to every inmate housed by the Department of Corrections." To require disclosure of this record to Mr. Murrell, and "every other inmate housed by the Department of Corrections "with a similarly tenuous claim, would defeat the purposes for which KRS 197.025(2) was enacted. In the absence of any evidence of an abuse of the discretion vested in the Department of Corrections by KRS 197.025(2), we affirm the Department's denial of Mr. Murrell's request.

A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.

LLM Summary
The Attorney General's decision affirms the Department of Corrections' denial of Eric K. Murrell's request for specific Corrections' policies as they were in various years, based on KRS 197.025(2). The decision follows the precedent set by 98-ORD-150 regarding the interpretation of amendments to KRS 197.025, which supports the Department's discretion to deny the request. The decision concludes that requiring disclosure based on a tenuous claim would undermine the purpose of the statute.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Requested By:
Eric K. Murrell
Agency:
Department of Corrections
Type:
Open Records Decision
Lexis Citation:
2000 Ky. AG LEXIS 19
Cites:
Forward Citations:
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.