Request By:
[NO REQUESTBY IN ORIGINAL]
Opinion
Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Amye L. Bensenhaver, Assistant Attorney General
Open Records Decision
The question presented in this appeal is whether the Office of the Governor violated the Open Records Act in responding to Muhammad Thabit Rashad's January 14, 1999, request for copies of records relating to conditions at Eastern Kentucky Correctional Complex which were in the Governor's custody. For the reasons that follow, we find that the Governor's office did not violate the Act.
Upon receipt of Mr. Rashad's January 14 request, the Governor's office conducted a search of its files and determined that there were no responsive records in its custody. Deputy General Counsel Michael T. Alexander immediately forwarded the request to the Department of Corrections to conduct an additional search and to respond on behalf of the Governor. Mr. Rashad challenges the Governor's actions, arguing that he submitted his request "'directly' to Gov. Paul Patton, for his response and action." We believe that the actions of the Office of the Governor were fully supported by the Open Records Act.
KRS 61.880(1) provides:
Each public agency, upon any request for records made under KRS 61.870 to 61.884, shall determine within three (3) days, excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays, after the receipt of any such request whether to comply with the request and shall notify in writing the person making the request, within the three (3) day period, of its decision. An agency response denying, in whole or in part, inspection of any record shall include a statement of the specific exception authorizing the withholding of the record and a brief explanation of how the exception applies to the record withheld. The response shall be issued by the official custodian or under his authority, and it shall constitute final agency action .
(Emphasis added.) As the highlighted language clearly demonstrates, an agency's official custodian of records is permitted to delegate his authority to issue a response to an open records request.
Pursuant to KRS 11.040(1), the Governor appoints, among others, the Secretary of the Justice Cabinet who serves on his executive cabinet and is required "to perform such duties as the Governor may require of [her]." See also KRS 11.065(2) which provides that the members of the Governor's executive cabinet "shall assist the Governor in the proper operation of his office and perform other duties the Governor may require of them." The Department of Corrections, to which responsibility for responding to Mr. Rashad's request was delegated, is attached to the Justice Cabinet.
In delegating its responsibility to respond to an open records request to the Department, the Governor's office properly exercised its prerogative under KRS 61.880(1), KRS 11.040(1), and KRS 11.065(2). We find no error in this action.
A party aggrieved by this decision may appeal it by initiating action in the appropriate circuit court pursuant to KRS 61.880(5) and KRS 61.882. Pursuant to KRS 61.880(3), the Attorney General should be notified of any action in circuit court, but should not be named as a party in that action or in any subsequent proceeding.