Request By:
Don Cetrulo, Director, Legislative Research Commission
Opinion
Opinion By: Albert B. Chandler III, Attorney General; Ross T. Carter, Assistant Attorney General
Statutes construed: Ky Const §§ 36, 37, 43OAGs cited: OAG 83-8 (f) Opinion of the Attorney General
We have been asked whether a legislator may participate in floor proceedings during a session by means of an interactive audio and video connection. The answer is no.
Our conclusion derives from two sources. First, although courts have had few occasions to address this issue, what little authority is available disfavors electronic participation in lieu of physical presence. In the absence of specific authorizing legislation, members of municipal legislative bodies may not vote by telephone. Fiscal Court of Jefferson County v Courier-Journal and Louisville Times Company, Ky, 554 SW 2d 72 (1977); KRS 61.826. Although this point of law has never been examined in the context of the General Assembly, we see no reason why the courts would adopt a different view for legislation at the state level.
Second, three provisions of the state constitution contemplate actual physical presence at the seat of government during a session. Section 36 states:
The General Assembly shall convene in regular session, and its sessions shall be held at the seat of government . . . .
Section 37 states:
Not less than a majority of the members of each House of the General assembly shall constitute a quorum to do business, but a smaller number may adjourn from day to day, and shall be authorized by law to compel the attendance of absent members in such manner and under such penalties as may be prescribed by law.
We have said that § 37, the quorum provision, requires that a member be actually present at the session in order to be counted for quorum purposes. OAG 83-8. The phrase "compel the attendance of absent members" implies that an actual presence is necessary.
Section 43 states:
The members of the General Assembly shall, in all cases except treason, felony, breach or surety of the peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance on the sessions of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same . . . .
A constructive presence by audio or video connection is patently inconsistent with these provisions.
Although a member might listen to and view floor proceedings via audiovisual technology, as any other person, an absent member could not under any circumstances be counted as part of a quorum, could not participate in the debate, and could not vote.