Request By:
Hon. Jim Zimmerman
State Representative
59th Legislative District
Room 316A
Capitol Building
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601
Opinion
Opinion By: Chris Gorman, Attorney General; Gerard R. Gerhard, Assistant Attorney General
By letter of March 5, 1992, you ask:
If a subdivision road has been accepted prior to July 1990, by a County Fiscal Court under KRS 179.470, does the county now assume legal and financial responsibility for road maintenance?
In our view, the answer is no, if , by "assume legal and financial responsibility for road maintenance," you mean full legal and financial responsibility for maintenance of certain subdivision roads, such that a county would not be entitled to reimbursement from owners of property abutting certain subdivision roads as provided for by KRS 179.470(2) and (3). Additionally, any legal and financial responsibility a county might have for maintenance of subdivision roads, would not attach in any event, unless all requisite conditions precedent to providing public maintenance for certain subdivision roads were met. Discussion follows.
Providing a reliable and definitive answer to the question you have posed is difficult because of the relative breadth of the question (it applies to all subdivision roads, regardless of whether they have been dedicated to public use, or meet other requisite standards), and because we do not know what is meant by "legal and financial responsibility, " in the context of your question .
Fiscal court (and thus county or public) maintenance of certain subdivision roads is expressly addressed in KRS 179.470(1) and (2), and in KRS 100.277(4), and the language of KRS 179.470(3), while not containing the express phrase "subdivision streets or roads," is applicable to such streets or roads. These provisions do not speak in terms of a fiscal court's "assumption of legal and financial responsibility" for maintenance of subdivision roads in those express terms.
KRS 179.470(1) provides, in part, that:
In counties containing a city of the third class, and not a city of the first class, any street or road located outside of the corporate limits of an incorporated city which is a street or road of a subdivision established by a recorded plat that dedicates the street or road to public use, shall be maintained by the fiscal court . . . [subject to conditions unrelated to the question you have presented.].
KRS 179.470(2) empowers a fiscal court, in counties containing a city of the first class, to maintain any street or road located in the unincorporated area of the county or in a city of the fifth or sixth class, which is a street or road of a subdivision that dedicated the street or road to public use (and meets criteria expressed in subsection (1) of KRS 179.470). KRS 179.470(2) also provides, in part:
The county shall be reimbursed for the cost of such maintenance by the abutting property owner whose proportionate share of the cost of maintenance shall be added to the owner's county tax bill and collected in the same manner as county taxes.
KRS 179.470(3) empowers a fiscal court, in counties containing a population between 80,000 and 115,000, and a city of the second class, or in counties containing a city of the fourth, fifth or sixth class, and not a city of the first, second or third class, to maintain "any street or road in an unincorporated area or a city of the sixth class of the county, which is at least two hundred (200) feet in length and dedicated to public use . . . ." Subdivision roads would be encompassed within such provisions. Language like that in KRS 179.470(2), providing for reimbursement of the county by "abutting property owners" for a proportionate share of maintenance costs, also appears in KRS 179.470(3).
The 1990 Kentucky General Assembly amended KRS 100.277(4) (Acts, 1990, ch. 362 § 14), adding to that subsection, the language underlined below. KRS 100.277(4), subsequent to July 13, 1990, reads:
Any street or other public ground which has been dedicated shall be accepted for maintenance by the legislative body after it has received final plat approval by the planning commission. Any street that has been built in accordance with specific standards set forth in subdivision regulations or by ordinance shall be, by operation of law, automatically accepted for maintenance by a legislative body forty-five (45) days after inspection and final approval .
(Emphasis added.)
Your question, in asking whether a county "now assume[s] legal and financial responsibility" for maintenance of subdivision roads accepted by a fiscal court prior to July, 1990, under KRS 179.470, presumably seeks to determine whether the amendment of KRS 179.277(4) (which, as indicated above, became effective on July 13, 1990), resulted in automatic acceptance of "legal and financial responsibility" for maintenance of subdivision roads accepted prior to the effective date of that amendment, such that there would be no required reimbursement of a county by an owner of property abutting a subdivision road, for a proportionate share of maintenance costs .
The amendment of KRS 100.277(4), in our view, does not provide, even in effect, for assumption of "legal and financial responsibility" for maintenance of all subdivision roads accepted prior to July, 1990, under KRS 179.470, by a fiscal court.
The language added to KRS 100.277(4), provides for automatic acceptance for maintenance, "by operation of law, " forty-five days after inspection and final approval, of certain subdivision roads ("streets built in accordance with specific standards set forth in subdivision regulations . . . . ") by a legislative body (which would include a fiscal court). Such language clearly does not by express terms impose unqualified "legal and financial responsibility" upon a fiscal court or county for maintenance of all subdivision roads accepted prior to July, 1990. In its express import, the language added to KRS 100.277(4) eliminates the need for seperate specific legislative action in order for certain subdivision roads to be maintained by a county (or city). Stated another way, the added language involves procedure related to public maintenance of certain subdivision roads. It does not address, as such, legal and financial responsibility for such maintenance.
In our view, the provisions of KRS 179.470(2) and (3), requiring owners of property abutting certain subdivision roads, in certain counties, to reimburse the county for a proportionate share of the cost of maintenance of such roads, remain effective . Accordingly, a county does not assume "legal and financial responsibility" for maintenance of subdivision roads accepte prior to July 1990, if, by "assumption of legal and financial responsibilty," you mean assumption of full responsibility for maintenance of such roads, without reimbursement from owners of property abutting them, where KRS 179.470(2) and (3) are applicable.
Additionally, in the case of any subdivision street or road, statutory conditions precedent to a county's maintenance of a subdivision street or road must be satisfied (e.g., dedication to public use, length, construction standards, inspection, and approval) before public acceptance of responsibility for maintenance of subdivision roads may occur.