Skip to main content

Request By:

Armand Angelucci
Chairman of the Workers' Compensation Board
Department of Workers' Claims
Perimeter Park West, Building C
1270 Louisville Road
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601

Opinion

Opinion By: Chris Gorman, Attorney General; Ross T. Carter, Assistant Attorney General

In OAG 92-21 we said that the Governor may not order the removal of an administrative law judge who violates a code of ethics imposed by executive order. We said that an administrative law judge may be removed only under KRS 342.230(3) and (4) for "violation of the code of judicial ethics." Our opinion has prompted you to ask:

1. If an administrative law judge employed pursuant to KRS 342.230(3) is found to be in violation of an Executive Order issued by the Governor, does this constitute violation of the Code of Judicial Ethics per se?

2. If the answer to question No. 1 is no, is the Workers' Compensation Board precluded from removing an administrative law judge from office under KRS 342.230(3)?

The "code of judicial ethics" cited in the statute apparently refers to the Code of Judicial Conduct adopted by the Supreme Court in Rule 4.300. We find nothing in the Code that would definitively broaden or define its scope to provide that any violation of an executive order constitutes a per se violation of the Code. The only provision of the Code that might suggest such a flat rule is paragraph A of Canon 2, which says:

A judge should respect and comply with the law and should conduct himself at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

We find the quoted language too vague to support a rule that violation of an executive order constitutes a per se violation of the Code. Therefore the answer to your first question is no. We note, however, that official interpretations of the Code can be obtained only from the Ethics Committee of the Kentucky Judiciary under SCR 4.310. We venture to provide an opinion here only because the Ethics Committee provides opinions only to justices, judges, and trial commissioners, and presumably would not offer an opinion on the question you present.

In response to your second question, the Workers' Compensation Board may certainly proceed to remove an administrative law judge for violation of the Code. The statute (KRS 342.030(4)) says, "The board may remove any administrative law judge for violation of the code of judicial ethics." If xban administrative law judge violates the Code, he may be removed, regardless of whether his conduct also violates an executive order.

LLM Summary
The decision in OAG 92-038 addresses questions regarding the removal of an administrative law judge based on violations of an executive order and its relation to the Code of Judicial Ethics. It clarifies that a violation of an executive order does not constitute a per se violation of the Code of Judicial Ethics and that the Workers' Compensation Board can remove a judge for violations of the Code as specified in KRS 342.230(3). The decision follows the precedent set in OAG 92-21 regarding the limitations on the Governor's power to remove an administrative law judge.
Disclaimer:
The Sunshine Law Library is not exhaustive and may contain errors from source documents or the import process. Nothing on this website should be taken as legal advice. It is always best to consult with primary sources and appropriate counsel before taking any action.
Type:
Opinion
Lexis Citation:
1992 Ky. AG LEXIS 37
Neighbors

Support Our Work

The Coalition needs your help in safeguarding Kentuckian's right to know about their government.