"As the Office of the Attorney General retreats from well-established caselaw, this shines as an example of how the law enforcement exceptions to the open records law should be interpreted. The merit attorney who wrote the open records decision, Michelle Harrison, clearly differentiates an incident report from an intelligence and investigative report and holds the agency to its burden of proving that disclosure of the incident report would cause actual concrete harm to the investigation/enforcement action — not a speculative risk of harm."